Written by Annika Dahlqvist on 11 May, 2010 at 10:46
Article in The Independent http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/features/donrsquot-blame-it-on-the-burgers-1970487.html .
When”everybody” believes that they have found the killer the lone detective realizes that the real perpetrator is still out there – ready to strike again.
When you eat a ”healthy balanced diet”, according to nutritionist’s model, you take in corresponding 60 teaspoons of sugar every day, which is not good.
It seems that the detectives alone may continue to face a tough enemy in the dark alleys of the “nutritionism”.
2010-05-11
2010-05-08
Moderate low carbohydrate diet.
Written by Annika Dahlqvist on 07 May, 2009 at 07:02
The SBU report on the scientific basis of diabetic dietary advice and in dietician’s press release the term moderate low carbohydrate diet is mentioned. By that they mean about 40 E% carbohydrates.
I read somewhere that before it came to low lipid dietary recommendations people spontaneously ate an average of about 40 E% carbohydrates, 40 E% lipids and 20 E% protein. Viewed from that is 50-60 E% high carbohydrate diet and d 40 R% normal carbohydrate. Low carbohydrate is at least below 30 E% and strict low carbohydrate below 10 E%.
The SBU report on the scientific basis of diabetic dietary advice and in dietician’s press release the term moderate low carbohydrate diet is mentioned. By that they mean about 40 E% carbohydrates.
I read somewhere that before it came to low lipid dietary recommendations people spontaneously ate an average of about 40 E% carbohydrates, 40 E% lipids and 20 E% protein. Viewed from that is 50-60 E% high carbohydrate diet and d 40 R% normal carbohydrate. Low carbohydrate is at least below 30 E% and strict low carbohydrate below 10 E%.
2010-05-06
Randomized studies
Written by Annika Dahlqvist on 06 May, 2010 at 18:18
SBU and the National Board of course require large, long, expensive randomized trials before they are willing to chance the priority of dietary advice.
Now that more and more diabetics try and discover what health improvement they have with LCHF of the old fat-frightened carbohydrate-rich diet – how will they be able to get large studies with raffled groups who eat low lipid and low carbohydrate? And who are willing to get involved with this hazardous low lipid diet for many years?
Hopefully, they will only get put down and recognise that there are no remaining diabetics who agree to eat low lipid diet.
SBU and the National Board of course require large, long, expensive randomized trials before they are willing to chance the priority of dietary advice.
Now that more and more diabetics try and discover what health improvement they have with LCHF of the old fat-frightened carbohydrate-rich diet – how will they be able to get large studies with raffled groups who eat low lipid and low carbohydrate? And who are willing to get involved with this hazardous low lipid diet for many years?
Hopefully, they will only get put down and recognise that there are no remaining diabetics who agree to eat low lipid diet.
2010-05-03
Mice were healthier by fatty breakfast
Written by Annika Dahlqvist on 28 April, 2010 at 15:12
Article in UAB Media Relations http://main.uab.edu/Sites/MediaRelations/articles/75217/
Fatty food after wakening started fat burning, while high carbohydrate food for breakfast started burning sugar.
Fatty breakfast decreased all aspects of the metabolic syndrome among the investigated mice. I did not understand it as whether it was better to eat high lipid foods during the rest of the day as well? They only write that that people eat ”mixed diet”.
De skriver bara att människor äter "blandad kost".
Dagens Medisin, Norway, also writes about this http://www.dagensmedisin.no/nyheter/2010/04/27/sunnere-med-kraftigere-fro/index.xml .
Article in UAB Media Relations http://main.uab.edu/Sites/MediaRelations/articles/75217/
Fatty food after wakening started fat burning, while high carbohydrate food for breakfast started burning sugar.
Fatty breakfast decreased all aspects of the metabolic syndrome among the investigated mice. I did not understand it as whether it was better to eat high lipid foods during the rest of the day as well? They only write that that people eat ”mixed diet”.
De skriver bara att människor äter "blandad kost".
Dagens Medisin, Norway, also writes about this http://www.dagensmedisin.no/nyheter/2010/04/27/sunnere-med-kraftigere-fro/index.xml .
2010-05-01
For our born and unborn children
Written by Annika Dahlqvist on 21 April, 2010 at 08:57
Letters to the officers of the Swedish National Food Administration
”In defence of our unborn children ” is the title of Stefan Jarl´s latest documentary, which you could read in –Dagens Nyheter yesterday 20 April and Svenska Dagbladet today. It is about all the thousands of chemicals that accumulate in our bodies during our lifetime. Toxic substances whose effects on health, fertility and life length you don’t know anything about. The concentration of chemicals increases every generation. I hope that this film will make us react. Both politicians and our health authorities have turned blind for a long time. One cannot help suspecting that there is something more than public health which is safeguarded. As individual it is very difficult to resist chemicals in the air, clothing, furnishing and toys.
In this context it is paradoxical to find out that you fill in the chemicals in children by serving them margarine at school.
A more chemicalized and hard processed product and marketed as food is hard to imagine. Speaking to the diet responsible for schools they state that they are just following the Food Administration’s recommendations. Some people don’t question at all, but many say that they would rather serve the children butter and they would never allow their own children margarine.
Here, there is something that the Food Administration can do directly to reduce the unwanted substances in the blood of our children, now that both the WHO and Ronald Krauss has torn the healthy saturated lipids as a risk factor.
Recommend that our children and the elderly in sheltered housing and our hospital patients get real butter! Butter with three known proven ingredients; cream, lactic acid and salt.
21 April, 2010
Margareta Lundström
Retired nurse
Göteborg
Letters to the officers of the Swedish National Food Administration
”In defence of our unborn children ” is the title of Stefan Jarl´s latest documentary, which you could read in –Dagens Nyheter yesterday 20 April and Svenska Dagbladet today. It is about all the thousands of chemicals that accumulate in our bodies during our lifetime. Toxic substances whose effects on health, fertility and life length you don’t know anything about. The concentration of chemicals increases every generation. I hope that this film will make us react. Both politicians and our health authorities have turned blind for a long time. One cannot help suspecting that there is something more than public health which is safeguarded. As individual it is very difficult to resist chemicals in the air, clothing, furnishing and toys.
In this context it is paradoxical to find out that you fill in the chemicals in children by serving them margarine at school.
A more chemicalized and hard processed product and marketed as food is hard to imagine. Speaking to the diet responsible for schools they state that they are just following the Food Administration’s recommendations. Some people don’t question at all, but many say that they would rather serve the children butter and they would never allow their own children margarine.
Here, there is something that the Food Administration can do directly to reduce the unwanted substances in the blood of our children, now that both the WHO and Ronald Krauss has torn the healthy saturated lipids as a risk factor.
Recommend that our children and the elderly in sheltered housing and our hospital patients get real butter! Butter with three known proven ingredients; cream, lactic acid and salt.
21 April, 2010
Margareta Lundström
Retired nurse
Göteborg
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
